RAY: The following is an article from Charles McVety, President of Canada Christian College which he sent me today. I think our readers will find this information most interesting.
——-
——-
Dear Ray,
Many people have asked me, who is behind this radical sex education program confusing our young children with six gender teaching starting in kindergarten?
This movement was started by Dr. Alfred Kinsey who was a scientist, researcher and pedophile. Dr. Kinsey is cited on page 19 of Toronto District School Board curriculum guide Equitable and Inclusive Schools. Dr. Kinsey also published an 804 page book in 1948 that spawned the sex education programs of today’s children. He taught that children are sexual from birth and had orgasms as early as two months old. He used 317 men to rape hundreds of children, recording their every move, timed with a stopwatch. A few ways that Kinsey described children’s orgasms include kicking, screaming, hitting, convulsions and vomiting.
Kinsey’s infamous “table 34″ (See Below) listed baby “orgasms” as young as 5 months old, and that a 4 year-old had 26 “orgasms” in 24 hours. This torture of little children led “scientists” to conclude that children need sex education as early as possible.
Now Ontario’s “Both/and — a curriculum resource for elementary school classrooms” states on page 18 “the idea of completely reforming the way that we as a culture think and speak about gender is daunting, at best. What better place to try though, than Kindergarten?”
As they teach Ontario ‘s precious children that they may be anyone of six genders and perform sexual experiments by inserting vegetables into each other, they do so based on the disturbing conclusions gleaned from Kinsey’s torture of children.
This must be stopped.
Please watch my TV Special on Dr. Kinsey, this Sunday Evening at 11:00 pm on Vision TV or at http://www.canadiantimes.ca
Also be sure to have your friends sign the petition at http://www.stopcorruptingchildren.ca
The TDSB wants to hear from you! Click here for more information
For the sake of the children please do not ignore this. I know you are busy but your action can help stop this insanity.
If not you, then who? If not now, when?
May God Bless You
Dr. Charles McVety
President, Canada ChristianCollege and School of Graduate Theological Studies
(We will post a link to the video after Sunday in the article as well. – Ray)
wow Ray,
that story is REALLY disturbing don’t know what anyone can say to that.
This article was submitted by Charles McVety of the Christian College and not by the panel of this website and may not reflect the opinions or the views of hosts and moderators Brad Snell. We welcome of course all views which is apart of free speech but certain material that may be posted isnt meant to harm or alarm the viewers just create an awareness to topics that we feel need adressing
I agree Brad that we posted the article from Charles McVety. But the article does not express an opinion. It reports on a fact. The fact is that the Ontario school board is using information that was produced by a known pedophile in order to justify teaching children about sex, including asking them to experience homosexual sex first hand by inserting vedgetables in their rectums.
I welcome anyone to refute these facts. Facts are not a matter of opinion but a matter of fact.
Of course we welcome opinions from our readers about these facts and / or to do some research to disprove the facts that are presented in this article.
Jesus said the truth shall set you free. If these facts reported by Charles are true then our readers should be set free by knowing this truth. Perhaps they will be set free to withdraw their children from receiving corrupted morals from their local public school which regretably is fast rejecting protestant belief ever since their name change from protestant school system to public school system.
Ray, you claim that this letter talks about facts, and that facts are not a matter of opinion. Could you please explain to me what the facts are here. Charles McVety states that Kinsey was a known pedophile and that he “used 317 men to rape hundreds of children, recording their every move, timed with a stopwatch.” If you bothered to check your “facts” (or if you read the report) you would find out that the data did not come from 317 pedophiles, it came from a single pedophile. And this single pedophile was not hired or coerced by Kinsey to rape 317 children. All of the data came from interviews with this individual after the fact. But saying that he hired 317 pedophiles to rape children is far more sensational than stating that he interviewed a pedophile, an act that psychologists and psychiatrists perform on a daily basis.
If you want to refute the conclusions of this study, fair game. There are many problems with this study, the least of which is that it is based on the recollections of a single person. But to publish a letter from a man who has been censured for making erroneous statements to support his views (Charles McVety), without checking the facts stated in the letter, is, at best, negligent. Given that the letter is falsely accusing someone who can’t defend himself of being a pedophile, not doing the basic research to determine the veracity of this “fact” is being complicit.
The chart is a fact that came from the book which proves that children were exposed to paedophilia. The exact wording of Charle’s article does not negate the fact that the School boards are using information that was gained by the practice of paedophilia. Charle’s is quite correct that this is junk science and has no business being consulted by the educators of our children in Ontario.
I will pass along your comments to Charle’s to see if he would like to answer your opinion of his article.
Ray, whether or not this is junk science is certainly an area for discussion, and you and I would probably come to the same conclusion. But that is not justification for labelling someone a pedophile when there is absolutely no evidence of this.
But this tactic happens to be one of Charles McVety’s favourite. He can’t discuss the science so he demonizes the scientist. Kinsey is a pedophile; Darwin is a racist. But the one thing that I have noticed is that he only goes to this extreme with people who are dead. I guess dead people don’t sue for libel.
I savour, lead to I discovered just what I used to be taking a look for. You’ve ended my four day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye
Wikipedia says that Alfred Kinsey was not a pedophile.
In response to Alex Keith, your concern for Kinsey’s and Darwin’s reputation is alarming on so many levels. Tell me why you think Darwin was not a racist based upon his published works and also that anyone who would even be associated with such a horrific study on children speaks loudly about who they are and your lack of mention for the children who were the victims…unbelievable…
This is sick and horrific, that children are being sacrificed for worldly pleasure and that they are now trying to make it a normal way of life. My heart breaks for the kids.